Research & Results

Our EMF protection technology is backed by over 40+ scientific studies conducted by leading research institutions across Europe and beyond.

40+
Scientific Studies
10
Years Warranty
0
Side Effects

Trusted by Our Community

Read how everyday users incorporate our devices into their daily lives and feel improvements across different areas of their lives

Biological Effects

Devices used: Neutraliser and Activator

Key Finding:

Blood test results demonstrate an increase in healthy red blood cell counts and a reduction in oxidative stress

Sleep Quality

Devices used: Neutraliser and Activator

Key Finding:

Users frequently report noticeable improvements in sleep quality and deeper rest, resulting in a deeper, more refreshing sleep experience

Cognitive Function

Devices used: RT Phone Neutraliser, Neutraliser and Activator

Key Finding:

Enhanced cognitive performance, sharper mental clarity, and reduced mental fatigue during daily tasks

Stress Response

Devices used: Neutraliser

Key Finding:

Users notice a clear reduction in their response to daily stress alongside an overall, sustained feeling of calmness

Featured Studies

Explore the studies examining how electromagnetic fields impact living organisms.

Radiofrequency Radiation and DNA Damage: Genotoxicity Testing and a 2025 Evidence Map
Published
US National Toxicology Program; Griffith University, Australia
2020 and 2025
500+ studies mapped
Published, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis; Frontiers in Public Health

Summary of rodent genotoxicity testing of mobile-phone-type radiofrequency radiation (RFR), and a scoping review mapping 500+ studies on RF-EMF and DNA damage.

Key Findings:

  • US National Toxicology Program (NTP) rodent studies, using whole-body exposure to CDMA or GSM signals, suggest RFR exposure is associated with increased DNA damage. Results in several tissues were rated equivocal
  • IARC classifies RF-EMF as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B), based on evidence in humans and animals
  • A 2025 evidence map of 500+ studies found DNA damage reported in 59% of them.
  • Among higher-quality studies, 48% reported DNA damage, and the authors concluded RF-EMF may be genotoxic and could pose a cancer risk
Does Radiofrequency Radiation Impact Sleep?
Published
RMIT University, Australia
2024
12 subjects
Duration: 4 weeks (7 nights per condition)

Pilot study testing whether overnight exposure to a 2.45 GHz baby monitor (active vs. sham) affects sleep in healthy adults at home.

Key Findings:

  • Insomnia scores (PIRS-20) were higher, meaning poorer sleep, with active exposure: 14.6 vs 9.6 on sham (p = 0.03)
  • EEG power in theta, beta and gamma bands increased during non-REM sleep
  • A study of people who reported mobile phone-related symptoms (Lowden et al., 2011) found poorer subjective sleep after a 3-hour exposure to an 884 MHz phone signal
  • Brain-wave changes during sleep. This is the most consistent signal. Several experiments with pulse-modulated RF-EMF, mostly mobile phone signals, report altered sleep EEG, typically changes in power in particular frequency bands. The Frontiers paper and a review it cites (Ohayon et al., 2019) describe this pattern.
The Real Cost of Uncertainty

When industry-funded research minimises the risks, who bears the burden of proof? Our key research investigates the intersection of mobile technology, pregnancy, and child development. While findings on reproductive health vary between small and large-scale studies, proactive individuals prefer safety over speculation—opting to shield their daily routine with reliable protection.

Growing public concern

Many people are concerned about the possible effects of EMF on their wellbeing. Studies funded exclusively by the telecommunications industry were less likely to report significant effects (Huss et al., 2007) and (Starkey, 2016).

Built with v0